Brown claims he stumbled upon ImCon data inadvertently, possibly through "misfiled" documents or a "mislabeled war game file" in 2018. He reportedly attempted to follow official protocols, submitting a formal report ("Immaculate Constellation Field Report") through pre-publication review, which was apparently approved and passed to Congressional staff by journalist Jeremy Corbell. Brown later went public on Corbell's "WEAPONIZED" podcast, stating his superiors blocked internal reporting attempts.

Brown's motivations appear rooted in ethical concerns about humanity's future, fearing what "humanity will do to itself out of fear and greed." He has acknowledged severe personal risks, including potential "life imprisonment and the possibility of execution," which contributed to his decision to reveal his identity. This underscores the gravity of the information he claims to possess. The approval of his report by pre-publication review, if ImCon is a top-tier USAP, is a perplexing detail warranting further investigation into information control mechanisms.

ImCon's establishment is purportedly linked to the period after Luis Elizondo's 2017 disclosures about AATIP/AAWSAP, possibly as a measure for deeper secrecy. Its primary mission is alleged to be the collection of IMINT and MASINT on UAP, Alien Reproduction Vehicles (ARV/RV), and Technologies of Unknown Origin (TUO). Crucially, it's claimed ImCon has operated for decades without lawful congressional reporting, potentially housed within the Executive Branch or White House, indicating a significant breakdown in oversight.

ImCon is described as a "parent" USAP overseeing various "child" SAPs, suggesting a sophisticated, long-term, multi-agency effort. This layered structure makes oversight extremely difficult. Its operational reach is global, using tasked and untasked military-intelligence resources across LEO, upper atmosphere, aviation altitudes, and maritime domains to monitor UAP/ARV worldwide, often near sensitive foreign assets.

A core allegation is ImCon's reliance on an AI system that autonomously scours classified servers for UAP encounter data. This AI allegedly ingests multispectral ISR data, filters anomalies, and routes them to compartmented silos based on pre-programmed clearance, deciding "who gets to see what in real time." The system is said to enforce compartmentalization by quarantining UAP/RV imagery before circulation within the Military Intelligence Enterprise. Alarmingly, Brown claims there's "no flag for filtered data. No audit trail," likening the AI to a "Two-Faced God" that shapes institutional reality by invisibly controlling information flow. This could lead to flawed intelligence and policy based on incomplete data, resembling capabilities discussed with systems like the NRO’s ‘Sentient’ AI program.

The DoD, through spokesperson Sue Gough, has stated it "has no record, present or historical, of any type of SAP called 'IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION'." However, historical precedents exist where the DoD initially denied UAP information later confirmed. The denial's specificity to the name leaves open possibilities of similar programs under different codenames or "Immaculate Constellation" being an informal term. AARO, the Pentagon's UAP office, claims its investigations found no evidence of extraterrestrial UAPs and that a proposed reverse-engineering program, "Kona Blue," was never activated due to no recovered technology. AARO attributes claims of government reverse-engineering and concealment to "circular reporting" lacking evidence.

A key document is Matthew Brown's alleged report (HHRG-118-GO12-20241113-SD003.pdf / Cannon 212_20241113_154539.pdf), reportedly provided to Congress by Jeremy Corbell and submitted by Rep. Nancy Mace for a House Oversight hearing. This report supposedly details ImCon's mission, AI reliance, UAP/ARV/RV focus, lack of oversight, and specific UAP incidents. A striking claim is that the report's public version was "reviewed and approved for public release by the Department of State, Bureau of Global Public Affairs," which is unusual for an alleged secret Pentagon USAP, raising questions about inter-agency dynamics or the review process.

These allegations were part of a House Oversight Committee hearing on Nov 13, 2024, "Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth." Witnesses included Michael Shellenberger, Luis Elizondo, Dr. Tim Gallaudet, Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy (Ret.), and Michael Gold. Shellenberger spoke directly about ImCon, attributing information to Brown. Elizondo testified to his belief in secret UAP research and retrieved non-human materials. Dr. Gallaudet recounted a 2015 naval exercise incident where a UAP-related "URGENT SAFETY OF FLIGHT ISSUE" email vanished from inboxes, interpreting it as a cover-up. He also mentioned feeling AARO officials attempted an "influence operation" against him. These testimonies suggest active measures to suppress UAP information, contrasting with stated goals of transparency.

The primary implication is the erosion of congressional oversight. A USAP operating for decades "without Congressional knowledge, oversight, or authorization" signifies a severe breach of constitutional power balance. The embedding of an alleged AI “gatekeeper” with no audit trail creates a deeply concerning dimension to secrecy, creating an “epistemic control layer,” where AI shapes perceived reality for personnel and policymakers—undermining due process, privacy, and free‐expression guarantees under the Fourth and First Amendments. This can compromise intelligence integrity and policy decisions, and would represent a fundamental breach of constitutional checks and balances, which the Supreme Court and lower courts have repeatedly held as essential to protecting individual rights. Such secrecy, coupled with official denials challenged by detailed claims, inevitably erodes public trust in government institutions, highlighting tension between national security and the public's right to know about phenomena with transformative potential.

Confirmation of NHI or vastly superior technologies would trigger a global existential re-evaluation, challenging human paradigms. The UAP Disclosure Act's inclusion of NHI definitions signals legislative contemplation of these possibilities. ImCon's existence would mean a select few have grappled with these realities secretly, creating destabilizing information asymmetry. Technologies of Unknown Origin could revolutionize energy, propulsion, etc., but also raise questions of control, weaponization, and equitable access. The secrecy might stem from geopolitical competition over mastering these technologies. Furthermore, national-level secrecy could hinder a unified global response to UAP/NHI, which are global phenomena, preventing open collaboration and ethical engagement strategies.

For DoD/contractor personnel with information: Official channels include Inspector General offices or the DoD Hotline (with specific procedures for classified info via SIPRNET/JWICS and ICWPA mechanisms). However, Matthew Brown's case highlights severe risks and perceived inadequacy of these channels. His fear of "execution" suggests existing protections are not seen as credible.

For citizens: Direct reporting of USAP suspicions is less defined. Contacting elected representatives and Inspectors General is an option. Promoting critical thinking, media literacy, and supporting broader transparency efforts (like the UAP Disclosure Act) are key. Engaging with officials on government secrecy and accountability is a civic duty. Supporting reputable investigative journalism, transparency advocacy groups, and academic research can also be effective.